restriction 是什么意思

简单地说，restriction 一般指法律法规、约定、合同、老者条件等所施加的限制，如 import restriction 进侍核薯氏旁口限制

moral restriction是什么意思

英文腊山：moral restriction

中文：道御谈德约束

很高兴为您解答

祝你生活愉快，学习进步

如果你对这个答案有什么疑问，请追问

如果满意镇局碰记得采纳哦·~~

英语Local plate restrictions怎么翻译？

Local plate restrictions可以翻译为“本地板块限制。”

重点单词：plate：英 [pleɪt]  美 [pleɪt] 

n. 盘子，碟子；一盘（食物）；平板，金属护板（片）；（刻有名字等的）金属牌子；（车辆的）号码牌；镀金层，镀银层；餐具；盾片，鳞甲；（地质）板块；

v. 给……镀（金属）；给巧型……加上装甲；用鳞片覆枝中盖；摆盘；（

【名】 （Plate）（英、德、俄、西、意、瑞典猛宽山）普拉特（人名）

词形变换： 复数 plates； 第三人称单数 plates； 现在分词 plating； 过去式 plated； 过去分词 plated 。

相关短语：

angle plate 直角板 ; [建] [机] 角板 ; [建] 角型板 ; 角钢

agar plate [微] 琼脂平板 ; 琼脂平面 ; 琼脂平皿 ; 培养基

bottom plate 下托板 ; 下固定板 ; 船底板

双语例句：

She eyed the fish on her plate suspiciously.

她不放心地看着自己盘子里的鱼。

The metal plate behind my head radiated heat.

我脑后的金属盘散发出热量。

求英语好的人来指教一下

牛津词典上说译为限制约束清颂时是不可数；译为限制性规定时是（个人觉得轿耐程度更深，有强制性规定，涉及到法律闭正春）

至于那句翻译，我觉得用restriction更为保险，因为并不一定触犯法律

restrictive是adj.而题中要填的显然是n.,strong已是adj，题目有打错吗？我认为应该是restrictions.硬性规定啊。

restriction是什么意思

中弊坦文翻译为：

restriction

[英][rɪˈstrɪkʃn][美][rɪˈstrɪkʃən]

n.

限制，限定; 拘租银桐束，束缚; 管制;

例句：

1、There is no restriction on article length.

文章的字数不加限制。

2、What 's more, the bank lifted a restriction for buying longer-term securities, which signals to investors that it' s in it for the long haul.

此外，日本央行还取消了购买长期证券的限制，意在向投资者表明它着眼于长期发搏芦展。

3、Export restriction will raise prices briefly but hold up an umbrella under which foreign compe*****s can gain a foothold.

出口限制将使价格暂时提高，但却为外国竞争者站稳脚根提供了保护伞。

专利审查文件中的election requirement 是什么意思?还有restriction 译作什么为好？ 谢谢！

restriction 翻译成"限制"即可. Election/Restriction Requirements经常是因为Examiner认为专利申请中包含多项发明,所以要求申请人选择其中之一来继续申请过程. 详细请看以下英文解释.

Election/Restriction Requirements

The patent office tends to issue restriction requirements whenever the pending claims within a given application address multiple subject matters. The restrictions follow naturally from the rule providing for a one-to-one correspondence between an invention and a patent. 35 USC § 101.

The USPTO is far stricter about restriction requirements than they used to be. For what it's worth, this occurrence appears to have resulted from the bonus system used at the patent office. Examiners currently get points for each patent application that the examiner "finally disposes". The more points, the larger the bonus. Since applications with lots of claims are harder to examine, it only makes sense that the patent examiners are quick to issue restriction requirements that quickly cut such applications down to size.

It is extremely difficult to successfully challenge a restriction requirement. The restriction is proper as between two claims if it is at all possible to practice the subject matter of either claim without practicing the subject matter of the other. The details of how the patent office goes about issuing restriction requirements, as well as some useful examples, are set forth in MPEP § 800 et seq.

There is only one proper response to a restriction requirement. The applicant must elect one of the Groups for prosecution, and the applicant must also state whether the election is being made with or without traverse. Election with traverse means that the applicant disagrees with the propriety of the restriction, and election without traverse means that the applicant agrees with the propriety of the restriction. The former must be supported by argument, and is just a waste of time. The examiner almost always prevails, so that all the patent attorney does by traversing a restriction requirement is waste the client's money. The applicant must also either cancel or withdraw the non-elected claims. Withdrawing usually makes sense. There can be difficulties in filing continuations to further prosecute the other groups if one had previously abandoned the non-elected claims. Note that failure to properly respond to the restriction requirement will result in the application going abandoned!